As a dynamic media force, glaad tackles tough issues to shape the narrative and provoke dialogue that leads to cultural change.
HRC envisions a world where lgbtq people are embraced as full members of society at home, at work and in every community.
HRC Director of Public Education and Research Ashland Johnson, said, This is dangerously bad information that will likely be taken out of context, is based on flawed assumptions, and threatens the safety and privacy of lgbtq and non-lgbtq people alike.
The, human Rights Campaign is Americas largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer equality.The study only looked at out gay men and women who are white, of a certain age, and are on dating sites.Technology cannot identify someones sexual orientation.Stanford University and the researchers hosted a call with glaad and HRC several months ago in which we raised these myriad concerns and warned against overinflating the results or the significance of them.Further, glaad and HRC today urged all media who either covered the study or plan to in future coverage to include the myriad flaws in the studys methodology including that it made inaccurate assumptions, categorically left out any non-white subjects, has not been peer reviewed.The research states: Outside the lab, the accuracy rate would be much lower (the lab certain dating sites) and is 10 points less accurate for women.Please try again later.Even if this were true given the aforementioned flaws, it still means that heterosexual men could therefore be identified as gay nearly 20 of the time.Imagine for a moment the potential consequences if this flawed research were used to support a brutal regimes efforts to identify and/or persecute people they believed to be gay.Click here, see all details for Modern Family Season.
For more information, please visit aad.
NEW york, glaad, the worlds largest lgbtq media advocacy organization, and the Human Rights Campaign, the nations largest lgbtq civil rights organization, today called on Stanford University and responsible media outlets to expose dangerous and flawed research that could cause harm to lgbtq people around.
The study assumed there was no difference between sexual orientation canadiske sex shop online and sexual activity, which is incorrect.
This research isnt science or news, but its a description of beauty standards on dating sites that ignores huge segments of the lgbtq community, including people of color, transgender people, older individuals, and other lgbtq people who dont want to post photos on dating sites.A professor affiliated with Stanford University has published a research study that resulted in several media outlets wrongfully suggesting that artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to detect sexual orientation.Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime.Customers also viewed these items, need customer service?The study reviewed superficial characteristics in the photos of out gay men and women on dating sites such as weight, hairstyle and facial expression.Glaad protects all that has been accomplished and creates a world where everyone can live the life they love.There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
The study assumed there were only two sexual orientations gay and straight and does not address bisexual individuals.
about glaad: glaad rewrites the script for lgbtq acceptance.
Stanford should distance itself from such junk science rather than lending its name and credibility to research that is dangerously flawed and leaves the world and this case, millions of peoples lives worse and less safe than before.